Jan 23, 2012

Shouldnt each of us be responsible for our own actions rather than making women and their lifestyle a yardstick for our society's respect and moral standards?

Women's Networks... really the need of the hour??

A recent press release talked about a company celebrating diversity & inclusiveness and how as part of this effort, its women’s network is organising events in different cities around the country. 
Diversity & inclusiveness on the same page as women’s network? Isn’t this defeating the very purpose of treating women any different than male employees? Promoting a women’s-only network, is segregating women into a club, making them stand out rather than blend in. 

What can the network offer that can’t be accessed without? If pubs and bars that exclude women are offensive then aren’t women’s network the other side of the same coin? 

At a healthcare global major’s women’s network meet recently, Vinita Bali, CEO, Britannia Industries voiced her displeasure quite explicitly, asking working women not to expect to be treated any differently than men. In doing that, women are already setting the tone for a differential treatment, which eventually leads to them becoming victims of various stereotypes in the workplace. 
Nirmala, you would have graced many such women’s events in the various MNCs you work with. What are your thoughts on the need for such networks?

Making-up competence?

A recent Harvard study found that women with make-up are perceived as being more confident. As part of the study, respondents were shown pictures of many women – of different ages and racial backgrounds – with different levels of make-up. They rated the women who had worn visible make-up as looking more competent compared to those hadn’t.

So, where does it leave the average woman with a career? Will lipstick and eye-liner help her land plum posts? Feminists have lashed out against the findings.

Often, corporate careers place subtle demands on women to dress and behave in particular ways. However, can a woman not confirm to these expectations and still be successful? Can organisations truly value employees for their loyalty and work; not their skills with the eye-pencil and blush?

Use or abuse of diversity?

Bangalore’s Namma Metro has proudly said that 5 of its 32 operators will be women.

When companies publicize the fact that they hire people of specific diversity groups (women, physically challenged etc), especially in roles typically not held by those groups, does it create a feeling of goodwill among the public, or feel like the company is simply trying to make itself out to be a more sympathetic employer than its competitors?

Does it look like a hero, or an ordinary person posing as one?