Shouldnt each of us be responsible for our own actions rather than making women and their lifestyle a yardstick for our society's respect and moral standards?

BU Panel Head Wants Dress Code

August 2011 Newsletter

Is pregnancy sure to deter our career advancement? How much is this up to us and how much support can we expect from our company? How do we handle employees from different generations working together? How do we manage employees who are change-resistant? All this and more!
Presenting our August 2011 newsletter - We welcome your thoughts and ideas!

http://interweave.cc/newsletter/aug2011/newsletter.html

Whose concern is it?

The article “Let Us Continue Work in Bar, Say 3 Women” in the July 8^th issue of The Times of India talks about how these 3 women have petitioned to let them continue working as bar stewards. Now, safety of employees, according to the law, is the responsibility of their employer. So how does the government, being the upholder of the law, have the right to suddenly decide that women can work at five- star hotels but not bars? Especially when the women themselves say that accommodation and safe transportation have, in fact, been given to them by their employer.

On one hand, the government claims to have the safety of these women in mind while on the other hand, it has unfairly pushed them out of this space of employment while they want to continue working in it.

Should there be a line that the government should not cross, between ‘protective’ and ‘stifling’? Or should the women be grateful that someone finally has their welfare in mind?